Should Treating Doctors Have to Report Doctor-Patients to AHPRA?

17 Jan 2017

sara bird

by Dr Sara Bird

Male doctor speaks encouragingly to older man

Doctors are entitled to the same medical care that other members of our community receive. And yet, the 2010 introduction of mandatory reporting of impaired health practitioners represents an additional barrier to doctors seeking help.  

Interviews with 18 doctors and four medico-legal advisers, who had experience with applying the mandatory reporting law, reported the legislation is a ‘blunt instrument’ that does not sufficiently take account of the realities of clinical practice.

All interviewees identified deficiencies in the way that the legal regime currently operates. The concerns focused on:

  • knowledge - lack of clear understanding of their obligations
  • content of the legislation which refers to past behaviour and fails to take into account whether the doctor-patient was willing and able to comply with a treatment plan
  • administration of the law - lack of confidence in AHPRA to respond to mandatory reports in a fair, timely, predictable and effective manner.

Interviewees spoke about taking into account a complex range of factors that are not mentioned in the legislation, including:

  • self-corrective steps taken by the doctor-patient
  • the risk of future harm
  • the probable consequences of a report.

MDA National has identified a number of problems with mandatory reporting of impairment.

We believe all treating doctors should be exempt from the duty to report impaired health practitioners, as is the case in WA.

The law has a flaw that needs to be rectified. Under the current law, a doctor who has placed the public at risk of substantial harm because of an impairment must be notified, even if their condition is now being effectively managed. This should be changed to assure doctors that they will not be reported to AHPRA if they are participating in an agreed treatment plan and have taken the necessary steps to protect patients, such as by limiting the nature or extent of their practice.

Six years after the introduction of the wide ranging reporting requirements, we should ask:

  • Is the mandatory reporting of impaired doctor-patients an effective mechanism to protect the public?
  • Have we got the balance right between the competing considerations of public protection and confidentiality for doctor-patients?
  • Is the legislation deterring doctors from seeking help and ‘driving problems underground’?

And remember you can obtain confidential advice and support from the Doctors’ Health Advisory Service if you are facing difficulties in relation to an impairment.


This blog contains general information only. We recommend you contact your medical defence organisation or insurer when you require specific advice in relation to medico-legal matters.



Doctors Let's Talk: Get Yourself A Fricking GP

Get yourself a fricking GP stat! is a conversation with Dr Lam, 2019 RACGP National General Practitioner of the Year, rural GP and GP Anesthetics trainee, that explores the importance of finding your own GP as a Junior Doctor.


25 Oct 2022

Systematic efforts to reduce harms due to prescribed opioids – webinar recording

Efforts are underway across the healthcare system to reduce harms caused by pharmaceutical opioids. This 43-min recording of a live webinar, delivered 11 March 2021, is an opportunity for prescribers to check, and potentially improve, their contribution to these endeavours. Hear from an expert panel about recent opioid reforms by the Therapeutic Goods Administration and changes to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme. 

Diplomacy in a hierarchy: tips for approaching a difficult conversation

Have you found yourself wondering how to broach a tough topic of conversation? It can be challenging to effectively navigate a disagreement with a co-worker, especially if they're 'above' you; however, it's vital for positive team dynamics and safe patient care. In this recording of a live webinar you'll have the opportunity to learn from colleagues' experiences around difficult discussions and hear from a diverse panel moderated by Dr Kiely Kim (medico-legal adviser and general practitioner). Recorded live on 2 September 2020.