The Fake Doctor – A Case of Stolen Identity
11 Dec 2017

In a wonderful twist on the “dog ate my homework”, attempts by the Inquiry to examine how Mr Acharya was recruited to work as an ICU Registrar were stymied by a possum which got into the ICU offices in February 2017 and damaged the relevant documents.
Nevertheless, the Inquiry managed to establish that:
- the fraud perpetrated by Mr Acharya to obtain and maintain his medical registration would not succeed under the current registration requirements for international medical graduates
- Mr Acharya stole the original medical qualifications of Dr Sarang Chitale, having befriended him when they worked together for six months as interns in 1999 at Joshi Hospital in India
- the extent of Mr Acharya’s prior medical training and experience is unknown
- there were inconsistencies between the CV and written references presented by Mr Acharya for registration in NSW, which could have been picked up with greater scrutiny and led to questioning of his application and possibly the detection of the fraud
- Mr Acharya’s performance in his first year of work in NSW was “just adequate” with “significant clinical gaps” but, by his second year, supervisory reports rated him as “average”
- while working as an ICU Registrar, Mr Acharya had a performance interview with two senior doctors because he did not tell the truth when reporting the condition and treatment of patients to consultants, apparently to “save face” and cover up knowledge deficits
- as reported to the Inquiry by two senior doctors, another ICU Registrar had detected that Mr Acharya was not properly qualified and complained to the Director of Medical Services who dismissed the complaint, although the Inquiry could not be reasonably satisfied that this occurred
- the Australian College of Emergency Medicine did not advise “Dr Chitale’s” employer or the Medical Board of his failure to attend and pass examinations over a lengthy period
- a review of six cases where patients contacted the Inquiry about Mr Acharya’s care did not reveal any mistreatment that resulted in adverse outcomes to patients, nor did a review of 15 patients for whom Mr Acharya signed a death certificate.
In September 2016, AHPRA received a notification from the pharmaceutical company where Mr Acharya was employed that the person practising as Dr Chitale may not be a qualified doctor. Following the investigation by AHPRA, Mr Acharya was charged with holding himself out as a medical practitioner.
Although Mr Acharya fled Australia and did not appear at the hearing, he was convicted on 3 April 2017 and given the maximum fine of $30,000.
Dr Sara Bird
Manager, Medico-legal and Advisory Services
MDA National
A health practitioners guide to social media
What are the laws and guidelines that impact social media for practitioners?
22 Jul 2025
Patient Autonomy in Australian Medical care
Do we really support patient autonomy in the decision-making process?
22 Jul 2025
Practicalities of Medicare
Do you understand the Medicare system and are you confident that your billing processes comply with requirements?
22 Jul 2025
Understanding changes to the Fair Work Act
What are the changes to the Fair Work Act and what is my role?
22 Jul 2025