Articles and Case Studies

The Criminality of Treatment Dr Patel and Beyond (Part 4)

11 Sep 2013

Dr Patel survives another court battle. Earlier this year a Queensland jury acquitted Dr Patel of the murder of Mr Morris, a former patient. On 29 June 2010, a Queensland jury found Dr Patel guilty of Mr Mervyn Morris’ manslaughter.

View other articles in this series:
Dr Patel & Beyond Part 3
Dr Patel & Beyond Part 2
Dr Patel & Beyond Part 1


However, in 2012 the High Court of Australia dismissed all charges against Dr Patel, relating to four patients because of a miscarriage of justice, but ordered a retrial. Following these events, the Queensland Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) filed new charges against Dr Patel in relation to Mr Morris’ death.

Why is it Dr Patel was acquitted by another jury in 2013 of Mr Morris’ manslaughter? Is this is the end of the matter for Dr Patel?

The High Court

Dr Patel had been convicted of three counts of manslaughter and one count of unlawful grievous bodily harm in the course of surgery on four patients while at Bundaberg Base Hospital. Section 288 of the Queensland Criminal Code (the Code) enshrines a legislative obligation to preserve life, and until this case, it was thought that obligation only applied to the actual performance of the surgery – requiring that surgery be performed with a reasonable standard of care and skill. The High Court determined that the prosecution’s conduct, in changing their focus mid‑trial, had led to a miscarriage of justice. However, Dr Patel was unsuccessful in persuading the High Court that s288 of the Code1 should be restricted in its application to the performance of surgery alone and not expanded to the decision to operate or to advise.

Mr Mervyn Morris

On 20 May 2003, Mr Morris (75 years old) was admitted to Bundaberg Hospital with rectal bleeding. On 23 May 2003, Dr Patel performed a sigmoid colectomy and colostomy. No bleeding point was found but the operation was straightforward and without complication. On 30 May 2003, Mr Morris suffered a wound dehiscence and a repair was performed.  Mr Morris died on 14 June 2003.

Claim by the prosecution

Noting the High Court’s interpretation of s288 of the Code, the prosecution abandoned allegations of surgical incompetence, focusing the case on fitness for surgery, incorrect diagnosis and post‑operative care.

Although the operation was performed “well enough”, the prosecution argued that Mr Morris responded poorly to the operation which lead to cardio-respiratory failure, hypoalbuminaemia and fluid overload, malnutrition, and septicaemia.

The jury finds Dr Patel not guilty

The jury trial commenced in early February 2013. The jury heard evidence from experts and colleagues.  A prosecution expert told the jury Dr Patel “conservatively” treated Mr Morris but that unexpected complications (not necessarily related to the operation) may have left Mr Morris permanently weakened. He was of the view that Mr Morris had an abdominal infection (one week after the procedure), which ultimately caused his death.

After five weeks of evidence and 48 hours of deliberations, on 13 March 2013, the jury found Dr Patel not guilty of the manslaughter of Mr Morris.

What now for Dr Patel?

As with all jury trials we will never know the reasons behind their finding. They appear to have accepted that Dr Patel’s management, while possibly deficient, was not grossly negligent or capable of a criminal finding. One could theorise that the trial was run in a different political environment – so the stigma around Dr Patel was diluted.

After this decision, Queensland prosecutors filed proceedings for a new trial against Dr Patel for causing grievous bodily harm to Mr Ian Vowles.

A new jury, armed with a new set of facts and hearing from different experts may arrive at a different outcome. The prosecution will undoubtedly learn from procedural problems faced at this trial. Whatever view one holds about Dr Patel, a finding of criminal conduct arising from surgical treatment must indeed have a high burden of proof. The acquittal by the jury perhaps recognises this high burden.

Kerrie Chambers is the Senior Partner in the Health Group at HWL Ebsworth Lawyers and Feneil Shah is an Associate.

1 Sections 291, 303 and 320 of the Code create the offences of unlawful manslaughter and grievous bodily harm.

Anaesthesia, Dermatology, Emergency Medicine, General Practice, Intensive Care Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ophthalmology, Pathology, Practice Manager Or Owner, Psychiatry, Radiology, Sports Medicine, Surgery


My Career Journey with Dr Nick Coatsworth

Dr Nick Coatsworth is an expert in health policy, public administration and a practising infectious diseases physician. He held a national role in the Australian response to COVID-19 as Deputy Chief Medical Officer of Australia, becoming one of the most recognised medical spokespeople during the pandemic. Nick engaged the Australian community through a variety of media platforms most notably as the spearhead of the national COVID-19 vaccination campaign. Dr Micheal Gannon, Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, sits down with Dr Nick Coatsworth to discuss Nick's medical career journey, and what insights and advice he has for junior doctors. MDA National would like to acknowledge the contributions of MDA National staff, Members, friends and colleagues in the production of the podcast and note that this work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under applicable copyright law, you may not reproduce the content of this podcast without the permission of MDA National. This podcast contains generic information only, is intended to stimulate thought and discussion, and doesn’t account for requirements of any particular individual. The content may contain opinions which are not necessarily those of MDA National. We recommend that you always contact your indemnity provider when you require specific advice in relation to your insurance policy or medico-legal matters. MDA National Members need to contact us for specific medico-legal advice on freecall 1800 011 255 or email We may also refer you to other professional services.


09 Jun 2022

Career complications and contending with uncertainty

Among the many challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic for junior doctors is how to respond to medical training impacts and career uncertainty. In this podcast, Dr Caroline Elton (a psychologist who specialises in helping doctors)and Dr Benjamin Veness (a Psychiatry registrar) share advice for coping with medical training and career delays, disruptions and unknowns.


10 Aug 2020